The Communal Narcissist: Another Wolf Wearing a Sheep Outfit

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/tech-support/201605/the-communal-narcissist-another-wolf-wearing-sheep-outfit?utm_source=FacebookPost&utm_medium=FBPost&utm_campaign=FBPost

Tuomareiden vapaa todistusharkinta mahdollistaa mielivaltaiset tuomiot Suomessa

http://oikeusjakohtuus.blogspot.fi/2016/04/tuomareiden-vapaa-todistusharkinta.html

Thought Police and Political Correctness in Modern Academia | Dr. Gad Saad

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZVX0GJ6164

Lenny Bruce - Stand-up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=umI4XCOGrmo

Mort Sahl - Stand-up

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lWPZZLTF9uM

MUST-SEE DOCUMENTARY: How Big Oil Conquered the World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ySnk-f2ThpE

Google "Hillary Clinton rape"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qA5Muvb3Fg

Climate Change is Unfalsifiable Woo-Woo Pseudoscience

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=huKY5DzrcLI

Mike Adams & the end of unhealthy living

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxCp6jznGQk

Art Capozzi - Pattern Recognition Time II

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-vnicN7sQsM

Maurice Strong is Dead

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q5ZgR_-SO8U

Take the $100,000 Global Warming Believer Challenge!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKl2ksAERS0

Do you believe in the catastrophic anthropogenic global warming hypothesis? Want to help the IPCC with an embarrassing little statistical problem in their latest report? Want to win $100,000? Today James introduces you to Douglas J. Keenan’s $100,000 contest to identify trend-driven time series. Details are in the show notes. Good luck!

SHOW NOTES
IPCC 5th Assessment Report

Statistical Analyses of Surface Temperatures in the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report

$100,000 Contest: identify trend-driven time series

informath.org

Filed in: Videos
Tagged with: global warming

Subscribe

If you enjoyed this article, subscribe to receive more just like it.

Privacy guaranteed. We never share your info.

Trackback URL | Comments RSS Feed

1. Myers says:

   11/30/2015 at 1:23 am

   In the sketch [from Monty Python] Michael Palin pays to have a five-minute argument with John Cleese. Despite his protests, all he gets for his money is rapid-fire contradction. Visibly agitated, he complains that he is dissatisfied.

   PALIN: An argument’s not the same as contradiction. An argument is a collected series of statements to establish a definite proposition.

   CLEESE: No it isn’t.

   PALIN: Yes it is! Argument is an intellectual process. Contradiction is just an automatic gainsaying of anything the other person said.

   CLEESE: No it isn’t.

   Like Cleese, many climate “contrarians” have no overall argument. Rather, they offer a series of inconsistent contradictions to specific statements, projecting an overall sense of umbrage instead of a reasoned critique. They claim that the observations are junk, and in the next breath that the observations disprove the models. They claim that temperatures aren’t rising, then that warming is caused by the Sun, or that the non-existent warming is good for us. They remind us that arguments from authority are unscientific, then ask us to respect the authority of retired NASA managers.

   Nobody (even at Heartland, it seems) disputes that CO2 molecules emit measurable heat, or that heat warms things up. But when contrarians assert that burning vast amounts of coal to power new industrial societies of billions of people won’t warm the climate, the onus is on them to provide a mechanism, a reason Earth’s climate should not warm when heat is applied though our everyday experience and common sense screams that it will.

   http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2012/05/changing-the-cultural-climate-on-climate-change/

   Log in to Reply
   • nosoapradio says:

     11/30/2015 at 2:31 am

     In direct response to Myers’ extract of a Scott Denning article:

     “…Writing on the Yale Forum, Warmist “scientist” Scott Denning wrote an article quoting not one scientific fact but claiming that it is “commonsense” that global warming is going on — and accusing skeptics of irrationality for denying it.

     Lord Monckton wrote a comprehensive reply to Denning which was not published by the Yale Forum. The Forum did however summarize Monckton’s reply as follows…

     Denning in that piece singled-out Monckton and two other climate science skeptics as unlikely to have been swayed by Denning’s 2010 and 2011 presentations before skeptical Heartland Institute annual meeting audiences. He was right on that point, Monckton confirmed in a 10-page 4,547-word essay he submitted for posting.

     * He says “the true difference between [what he calls] the true-believers and the skeptics” is found in temperature feedbacks, which he concludes will be “somewhat net-negative, attenuating rather than amplifying the direct warming and removing the climate problem altogether.” This leads him to conclude that “this century’s CO2–driven warming will be just 0.5 Celsius,” about .8 F…

     …

     * He accuses Denning of setting up “a number of straw men” and maintains that the actual consensus is that “a degree or two [Celsius] of warming would indeed be good for us.”

     * He criticizes Denning for providing “not a single quantitative argument,” but rather for providing a commentary “full of politics and polemics and emotion and a startling number of fallacies.” “This does not impress,” he writes…”

     http://awesternheart.blogspot.fr/2012/05/monckton-replies-to-warmist.html

     http://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/dl/Monckton_Denning.pdf

     Log in to Reply
     • Myers says:

       11/30/2015 at 6:19 pm

       I have written a few posts under these recent articles by James about AGW. I promise this is my last.

       I agree with Denning in that most of what I read or hear on the side of climate skepticism has no overall theory. The only real theory that I do read as to why climate science has grown to be such a large concern within the scientific community, is that it is a liberal conspiracy of gravy-trainers chasing government grants, and faking research on a colossal scale in order to do so. That and/or a mega plot inspired by elites to depopulate the Earth, impose taxes on Carbon.

       One question I keep asking and that I have not read a response to is ‘How does the story of Exxon’s own research findings fit into these theories’? They are not part of the academic world, yet they concluded the same risk in the burning of fossil fuels. They kept it secret, in a way directly analogous to other cases of disputed science (smoking, acid rain, ozone depletion). They went further to deliberately spread disinformation, spending vast sums of money in the process in an act of commercial damage limitation. 

       If there is a genuine reason as to why most scientists who work in Earth sciences consider AGW a serious threat/risk (other than that they are convinced by the scientific literature on the subject), then what is that reason and how does the Exxon story fit with it?

       Log in to Reply
2. hankblackgraphics says:

   11/30/2015 at 3:30 am

   Are hackers and psychics eligible?

   
   

The Power of Consciousness - Freeman Fly

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=vm_2OzTvOHk

Practical Solutions to Change the World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ETGhcefJAKk

Paris Attacks: William Engdahl Explains the Past, Present and Future of the War in Syria

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukHpYWkgfyo

Sexualization of children in media Cradle to the Grave Marketing part 2 downsizing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UhNcKFhydNc

Public Safety versus Dangerous Hippie Bullshit

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sc0RmnlinBU

The Technocratic Agenda: Sustainable Development and Climate Eugenics #Paris

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUb2ITS3Vmw

https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1011-patrick-wood-exposes-the-technocrats-climate-eugenics-agenda/

1. nosoapradio says:

   11/14/2015 at 6:36 pm

   I think that COP21 conference hoopla may create the perfect pretext for literally “outlawing climate skepticism”. 

   Indeed, this would seem crucial to silence the François Gervais, Henrik Svensmarks and Vincent Courtillots of the world and “stampede” the populations into the smart paradigm otherwise known as technocracy (or the NWO). Stigmatization, media censorship, selective funding and self-censorship may not be working out as planned.

   Already, COP21 protesters (obviously comprised of climate skeptics, n’est-ce pas?) are being assimilated and associated with so-called islamic terrorists;

   “…The attack comes as France has heightened security measures ahead of a major global climate conference that starts in two weeks, out of fear of violent protests and potential terrorist attacks…”
   http://www.elpasotimes.com/story/news/world/2015/11/13/french-police-report-shootout-and-explosion-paris/75728238/

   Polls may show that climate change is number 5 or 6 on French people’s preoccupation list but the fact is that it’s impossible to question man-made climate change in France and be taken seriously. Neither by young nor old.

   Incidentally, Agenda 21 has sprouted up like crabgrass (as it was programmed to do) in every department, large or small, in France as well and may well be usurping unwitting and well-intentioned people’s time, budgets and energies.

   Finally, I feel a little like Stanley Motts of Wag the Dog fame as I’ve read over and over again Patrick Wood’s hand written dedication on the Technocracy Rising book I ordered and received.

   Some time I’ll get around to reading the cover…

   Log in to Reply
   • nosoapradio says:

     11/15/2015 at 5:24 am

     http://technocracy.news/index.php/2015/10/14/top-judges-want-to-criminalize-climate-change-denial/

     Log in to Reply
2. setatliberty says:

   11/14/2015 at 10:50 pm

   This podcast could not have been more timely. I see God’s hand upon your work James; In that you recorded this the day before the Paris attacks which have brought the nation of France into a state of martial law. How great an “opportunity” to prevent large protests, eh?

   Log in to Reply
   • doublek321 says:

     11/15/2015 at 8:39 am

     Thank you for posting that as I was going to ask “any chance the Paris thing is a false flag related to the climate summit?”

     Log in to Reply
3. Fosca says:

   11/16/2015 at 3:46 am

   Hi James,
   Sorry to say but this episode made me angry to a big extend.  Let me explain why.

   At around 12:00 Patrick explains that a first grader can understand how the earth works with regards to CO2 and that we are facing plans to reduce all CO2 down to zero, which is sterilizing the world. This is simply nonsense! If at all man made emmission of CO2 shall be reduced to zero which would lead to a situation similar to maybe only a couple of thousand years ago before mankind started burning coal.

   Instead Patrick makes up a story that burning coal, oil and gas is the best to continue for the coming centuries.
   IMHO this is maximum dillusion that I only have heard from neocons before! Not only Patrck explains the 1st grader story, but also openly admits he does not understand anything on the global taxation problems. Only concludes taxes are bad.

   What makes me angry finally is not the fact it is rubbish what is conveyed. But this stuff jeopardizes the real story. Like the use of the CO2 story to gain world wide control. Certainly not an episode I can ever recommend without fearing people think I am completely nuts.

   I know you made better shows than this and I am sure there will be more great stuff coming!:-)

   Cheers
   Fosca

   
   

feminist silencing backfires massively [laughing witch response]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZcXha109HsI

https://www.youtube.com/user/Jaistar2k22/videos

https://twitter.com/j_millerworks

http://jmillerworks.com

Fat Feminist Gets Dumped And Responds Predictably

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JC5k859wU-M